Practitioner · Researcher · Governance Practitioner
Enterprise Software Quality Governance · Regulated Healthcare Systems
Over a decade of experience governing complex, multi-vendor system integrations in regulated healthcare environments — at the intersection of software engineering practice, compliance assurance, and UAT governance.
I am an enterprise software quality practitioner with over a decade of experience governing complex, multi-vendor system integrations in regulated healthcare environments. My work sits at the intersection of software engineering practice and compliance assurance.
I examine how acceptance criteria are interpreted, translated, and enforced across regulatory boundaries, vendor ecosystems, and delivery lifecycles — and I develop frameworks that give quality leaders structured tools to close these gaps systematically.
My practitioner research focuses on UAT governance, release assurance, and acceptance-layer architecture, with particular expertise in ACA/HIX platform testing and enterprise QA leadership within Commonwealth of Massachusetts health IT systems.
Two practitioner frameworks developed from frontline experience governing regulated healthcare software delivery — currently under academic review.
Identifies and characterizes the structural distance between regulatory mandate and technical specification in healthcare software delivery. Provides quality practitioners with a diagnostic model for locating where compliance intent erodes across the translation chain.
Core Dimensions
Defines a structured mediation layer between regulatory intent and executable acceptance criteria. Formalizes how quality governance teams translate policy requirements into verifiable test conditions across multi-vendor and multi-release delivery environments.
Core Dimensions
The RIG framework (left) diagnoses where regulatory intent erodes across the delivery chain. The ATL framework (right) provides the structured governance response.
The RIG & ATL Frameworks
Governance Structures for Regulated Healthcare Software Delivery
Current practitioner research contributions under formal academic review.
Closing the Regulatory Interpretation Gap in Enterprise UAT
PNSQC — Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference
A Governance Framework for Regulatory Interpretation Alignment in Multi-Vendor User Acceptance Testing
IEEE Access
The RIG & ATL Frameworks: Governance Structures for Regulated Healthcare Software Delivery
Zenodo Preprint · zenodo.org/records/19870009
Research artifacts and submission status will be updated as formal review processes progress.
Professional interests include peer review and practitioner-track participation in software quality, healthcare IT, and regulated systems engineering.
Reviewer Interests
Practitioner background positioned to contribute informed, grounded review across these areas:
Target Engagement
Interested in contributing to peer review, practitioner-track programs, and governance-focused software quality initiatives within regulated technology domains — including conferences, workshops, and practitioner-oriented software quality initiatives.
Open to research collaboration, peer review requests, and practitioner framework discussions.
I welcome inquiries regarding research collaboration, peer review requests, and practitioner framework discussions.